24/07/2026
FORMER MIGORI GOVERNOR OKOTH OBADO FOUND GUILTY OF SHARON OTIENO'S MURDER
Former Migori Governor Okoth Obado has been found guilty of the murder of 26-year-old Sharon Belyn Otieno, bringing to a close one of Kenya's most closely followed murder trials.
The High Court also found Obado's co-accused, Michael Oyamo and Caspal Obiero, guilty in connection with Sharon's murder.
Sharon, a Rongo University student, was abducted in September 2018 while she was approximately seven months pregnant. Her death shocked the country and sparked intense public interest, particularly because of her alleged relationship with the former governor.
THE ABDUCTION
On the night of September 3, 2018, Sharon was in the company of journalist Barrack Oduor. The two were reportedly travelling after Sharon had sought the journalist's assistance in publicising her situation.
According to evidence presented in court, Sharon and Oduor were intercepted and abducted. They were forced into a vehicle and driven away.
Oduor later managed to escape from the vehicle by jumping out. Sharon, however, remained in the hands of her abductors.
The journalist subsequently reported the incident, triggering a search for Sharon.
SHARON'S BODY DISCOVERED
Sharon's body was later found in the Owade area of Homa Bay County.
The discovery turned the case into a major criminal investigation, with detectives seeking to establish who had abducted her, who had killed her and why.
A post-mortem examination revealed that Sharon had suffered multiple serious injuries. The court heard that she had been stabbed several times and had also been strangled.
Sharon was approximately seven months pregnant at the time of her death, and her unborn baby also died.
THE ALLEGED MOTIVE
During the trial, the prosecution linked the murder to Sharon's relationship with Obado and her pregnancy.
The prosecution's case was that Sharon's pregnancy and her relationship with the former governor were among the circumstances surrounding her killing.
However, it is important to distinguish between the prosecution's theory of motive and the court's final findings. The court ultimately convicted the three accused after considering the evidence presented during the lengthy trial.
THE EVIDENCE AGAINST THE ACCUSED
The prosecution relied on a combination of witness testimony and circumstantial evidence to build its case.
Among those who testified was journalist Barrack Oduor, whose account of the abduction provided important evidence about the events leading to Sharon's disappearance.
The court also heard evidence concerning the movements of the accused persons, the circumstances surrounding Sharon's abduction and the events that followed.
The prosecution further presented evidence concerning attempts to establish an alibi and other actions allegedly taken after Sharon's disappearance.
The defence, however, denied the allegations and challenged the prosecution's evidence.
THE COURT'S VERDICT
After considering the evidence presented during the trial, the High Court found Okoth Obado, Michael Oyamo and Caspal Obiero guilty of Sharon Otieno's murder.
The conviction means that the court found the prosecution had proved the criminal responsibility of the three accused beyond the required legal threshold.
The case is significant because it establishes the accused persons' legal responsibility for the murder. However, it should not be reported as proof that Obado personally stabbed or strangled Sharon unless the court specifically made such a finding.
The legally accurate description is that Obado was convicted of Sharon Otieno's murder, alongside his co-accused.
The conviction may still be challenged through the appeal process, depending on the decisions of the accused and their lawyers.
A CASE THAT SHOCKED KENYA
Sharon's murder became one of Kenya's most prominent criminal cases of the past decade.
Her death drew widespread attention because of the circumstances surrounding her pregnancy, her alleged relationship with a senior political figure, her abduction and the brutal nature of the injuries revealed during the post-mortem examination.
For years, Sharon's family and members of the public followed the proceedings as the prosecution and defence presented their respective cases.
The guilty verdict now marks a major development in the long-running case, although the legal process may continue through sentencing and possible appeals.
For Sharon's family, the conviction represents a significant moment in their long pursuit of justice for the young woman and her unborn child.
17/07/2026
11/07/2026
08/07/2026
02/07/2026